May 21, 2013

Today's Question

Which senator wrote the amendment that gave military leaders the right to "quell...civil disturbances" without presidential approval? Answer.

Please use the PayPal button above to donate to The US Report.

Subscribe with Kindle

Search the US Report. 


Please visit The US Report bookstore!

Need a speaker for your next event? Contact us.

 

__________

 The US Report, an indie publisher, features stories about politics, public figures and government. Learn more about The US Report  and the credentials of our contributorsHelp us keep TUSR online; use the PayPal link in the right column.

__________

Sunday
Dec052010

GOP should introduce 'Warren Buffett regulation' in tax package

Republicans should introduce the Warren Buffett regulation as part of the tax package being negotiated with Democrats.

Republicans want to leave  tax rates as they are while progressive Democrats want to enable a tax hike on incomes progs deem ‘rich.’

The rich have been variously described at levels beginning at either $200,000 or $1,000,000 (single filer)depending on who’s doing the talking.

Conservatives in general believe tax rates should be left alone for a number of reasons. First, history shows when a tax increase is enabled, Congress spends more. Progs have set records for spending since taking control of Congress in 2006, and it is statistically likely the ideology will not change.

Another reason is that American wealth does not belong to the government or to progs who love the concept of taxing “richie.” The prog approach is endorsed by most government-friendly media—almost every headline about the tax issue suggests Democrats want to give the “middle class” a tax break and levy more taxes on “richie.”

Richie icon Warren Buffett has been outspoken in calling for a tax increase—apparently he has a certain amount of guilt over the wealth he has accumulated. Other fellow zillionaires have joined him in calling for tax increases that would also impact any number of small businesses. Incidentally, political fact often overrides common sense where progs are concerned.

The solution to the dilemma rests in introducing a ‘Warren Buffett’ regulation. The regulation can be named to honor one of the wealthiest tax fans in the world.

Rather than rewrite any tax code, the regulation could be designed as a stand-alone form. The form could be used for zillionaires and any other tax increase fans (regardless of income) to donate money to the federal government for any purpose Congress or the president deems aligned with progressive spending.

The contribution would not be tax deductible. The simply worded stand-alone regulation could simply be filed with the taxpayer’s income tax forms and payment could be accepted via existing procedures.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, Rep. Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Harry Reid should be first in line to contribute funds because they’re big pushers in the tax increase movement and they have contributed to historically record levels of spending.

Introducing the regulation into whatever package is agreed upon is a simple way of seeing exactly which progressives are willing to put their own money where they’d like to put others’ money.

Meanwhile Mr. Buffett can man up and be first to contribute some of the wealth that apparently troubles his conscience. Considering the wealth held by Buffett and many of his fellow prog "richies," and considering the wealth held by numerous progs in Congress, it is likely the government would see a windfall by enacting the 'Warren Buffett Tax Me' regulation.

 A simple form could be used to implement the 'Warren Buffett Tax Me' regulation. This draft is provided as an example only and is not an official government document.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

« Libertarian Party outrage over Snipes’ prison sentence | Main | Prog tax hikers push class warfare, government control of wealth, hysteria »