Perry does meet and greet with his supporters—and with Obama’s

Gov. Rick Perry at Right Online conference. [Screen Snip]Today on Facebook I responded to a comment posted by my friend Cindy Graves, president of the Florida Federation of Republican Women. Cindy asked us to vote in a newspaper poll related to criticism of Gov. Rick Perry’s comments about Federal Reserve chair Ben Bernanke. I commented about criticism of Perry, and concluded with this:

“Thus far, Perry is not only like a breath of fresh air to a maddeningly dull campaign field. He is telling it like it is. In my opinion.”

A few minutes later, a headline came in from The Boston Globe: ‘Protesters quiz Perry sharply in N.H.’ It would've been helpful had the newspaper written the header as 'Democrats quiz Perry sharply in N.H.'

One of the so-called ‘protesters’ happens to be high profile Democrat Martha Fuller-Clark. She jumped on Perry about the worn-out climate change [formerly global warming formerly Little Ice Age] meme. Clark has to be chummy with Democratic National Committee chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz because Clark serves on the Democratic National Committee among other things. Furthermore, Clark was co-chair of the Dems’ committee to elect President Barack Obama in 2008.

Democrats are running pretty scared of Perry if they send out someone on Clark’s level to quiz him.

Perry doesn’t buy into CC/GW/LIA like some so-called moderate Republicans do. His stance is based on opposing scientific theories, but legacy media has blacklisted almost anyone who disagrees with the United Nations’ job-killing, America-diluting position on carbon emissions.

As an aside, I’d say you could limit every carbon particle on Earth and you will still see climate change eventually. To believe otherwise is to suggest you are extremely naïve and I would ask if you believe otherwise, please produce a dinosaur for me.

Currently the website Watts Up With That? has an article posted about more exaggerations on climate sensitivity. It took two years for the article to surface, and WUWT? said “hostile reviewers” held it up. Those “hostile reviewers” did the same thing with other articles that contradicted science-by-consensus theories.

As a lifelong conservationist, I am all for recycling, protecting natural areas and wildlife habitat and waterways. As a realist, I know that we must regulate air quality within reasonable boundaries. However, I also know limiting or sequestering carbon emissions will not protect the environment. As a matter of fact, I have serious concerns about safety factors in carbon sequestration protocol.

Do you want carbon sequestered in your back yard? I don’t. If you think bureaucrats beholding to the financial sectors hoping to make money off carbon emissions are going to sequester in the Hamptons, I’d ask you again to produce me a dinosaur.

Obama supporters like Clark cannot be expected to make a rational decision about climate change, or even to acknowledge the Democrats’ job-vaporizing agenda when it comes to the same. I believe Democrats’ policy on this matter has actually led to an increase in hunger in third world countries and to skyrocketing utility costs for Americans.

Those skyrocketing costs should not surprise. During the 2008 campaign, Obama promised, "Under my plan...electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket."

That’s one promise he kept.

Related/Source Articles

Failure of Cap and Trade wards off loss of 1.9 million US jobs (The US Report)

Congress set to keep Obama’s promise electricity rates will skyrocket (The US Report)

New paper from Lindzen and Choi implies that the models are exaggerating climate sensitivity (Watts Up With That?)

Facebook group (open): Florida Federation of Republican Women

(Commentary by Kay B. Day/Aug. 18, 2011)

Please help keep The US Report, an indie blog, online by making a small donation via the PayPal link in the right column.