Visit Florida D.C. Women's Project 

 

SEARCH THE US REPORT:

 

Please visit The US Report bookstore!

Need a speaker for your next event? Contact us.

 

 The US Report, an indie publisher, features stories about politics, public figures and government. Learn more about The US Report  and the credentials of our contributorsHelp us keep TUSR online; use the PayPal link in the right column.

U.S. News and Commentary



 

   June 2, 2012

Want to advertise here? Contact us for info about ads and sponsorships.

Please use the PayPal button above to donate to The US Report.

Subscribe with Kindle

Recent Articles

Friday
Aug052011

Fannie Mae, another New Deal deal that soured $104 billion tax dollars

The Live Leak video from 2008 shows Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) angrily denying she took political contributions from Fannie Mae. As Open Secrets shows, Waters did receive such contributions. It would have been easy for Maher to have his staff fact check Waters’ denial—the data turns up in a Web search in seconds. Waters is a Democrat, so Maher gave her a pass.Fannie Mae, for progressive politicians, was the cash cow that kept on giving. From its creation under President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1938 to an explosion in funds, the “Trillion Dollar Commitment”** announced by President Lyndon B. Johnson, Fannie Mae has enjoyed fierce protection from Democrats like Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) and Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.)

Those Democrats and some errant Republicans received campaign contributions from the government sponsored enterprise (GSE) that is one reason the US housing industry is in tatters. When fiscal conservatives demanded more oversight, Waters and Frank attacked them just as Democrats attack fiscal conservatives now.

Democrats repeatedly assured Congress Fannie Mae was just fine, thank you. Legacy media was too busy bashing Bush to take a second look at Fannie Mae.

CNBC just provided a wakeup call about the GSE. Fannie Mae wants $5.1 billion more from taxpayers because of losses.

This isn’t the first time Fannie has approached Uncle Sam with hat in hand. CNBC said, “Since the firm was seized by the U.S. Treasury in 2008, it has needed about $104 billion in government capital injections, although it has paid back about $14.7 billion in dividends.”

For the long, sordid tale of the socialization of the housing market, turn to the Ludwig von Mises Institute where Karen DeCoster and Eric Englund explain how Fannie Mae's failures were downplayed on the pretense the GSE had “a critical role in driving the housing sector” that in turn, drove the US economy.

When Democrats talk about driving the economy over the cliff, they should be reminded that’s exactly where they took housing when they ushered in a socialist approach to the market. George W. Bush may own the Iraq War, but Democrats own Fannie Mae.

Fannie has been caught up in scandals for rewarding loser CEOs and staff (some work for President Barack Obama) with millions in bonuses. Rosy financials were cooked up on the books in a scandal that would have sent most CEOs to federal prison.

DeCoster and Englund wrote in their 2008 essay, “So here we have a company surrounded with much misconception in the financial markets and accused of deceit by its own government overseers. It has chunked away nearly 40% of its profits via restatements of its fraudulent financial statements for recent years.”

The authors predicted the collapse of Fannie Mae in that 2008 essay.

Related Stories and Sources

**[Print source] ‘Reckless Endangerment: How Outsized Ambition, Greed, and Corruption Led to Economic Armageddon’ by Gretchen Morgenson and Joshua Rosner; Times Books, Henry Holt and Co., N.Y., 2011. Page 59.

Shameful: Congress refuses hearings on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (The US Report)

Geithner suggests more multiplexes, admits GSE role in meltdown (The US Report)

Campaign contributions to lawmakers from Fannie Mae (Open Secrets)

(Commentary by Kay B. Day/Aug. 5, 2011)

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

« Democrats desperate over record, fire at Tea Partiers for cover | Main | Big Nanny goes paternal with $150 million for fatherhood and marriage grants »

Reader Comments (2)

Fannie Mae corruption is about several specific people making very real money (millions of dollars) at the taxpayers expense. For a while now, I have followed the career of Fannie Mae Associate Vice President Lea France who has become notoriously famous for her strange and abusive management style. Looking at the sales records I see a very specific investor who follows her career very closely as well. Following her from one state to another, the investor buys only Fannie Mae owned properties paying cents on the dollar in each area of the country that she manages at the time and subsequently flipping them a few months later making a very quick no-risk 40-60% profit on each sale. I am documenting my findings in the following blog:

http://lea-france-fannie-mae-complaint.blogspot.com

This activity has been going on for years and nobody at Fannie Mae wants to do anything about it. I would welcome your opinion on the matter.
August 15, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterJohn D
John, have you contacted your representative or congressman? This sounds like more corruption to me. I will take a look at your blog later today. I will say nothing that comes out of Fannie or Freddie would probably surprise me at this point. I believe both those enterprises have been key tools in the looting of the US Treasury and taxpayer. Frankly I believe hearings should be held--real hearings, not the circus events we were treated to in years past. Thanks for sharing your information--best, KBD/TUSR editor
August 16, 2011 | Registered CommenterKay B. Day, Editor
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.