U.S. News and Commentary

 

 Visit FFRW.

 

 The US Report, an indie publisher, features stories about politics, public figures and government. Learn more about The US Report  and the credentials of our contributorsHelp us keep TUSR online; use the PayPal link below.

Subscribe with Kindle

Visit Florida D.C. Women's Project 

 

SEARCH THE US REPORT:

Visit our new Books and Sundries page for recommended reads!

NEWS BRIEFS

Feb. 19, 2012

*Book Review: Being George Washington
*Romney camp erred on context, date... (The US Report)
*Politico says GOP candidates 'not worthy' of journalists  (The US Report)

 Election 2012, Resource Pages  (The US Report)

Please visit The US Report bookstore!

Need a speaker for your next event? Contact us.



Friday
Sep252009

Democrats aim to assist newspapers with 'revitalization' act

Adding another item to a long list of items that defy the U.S. Constitution, Democrats have introduced HR 3602 and a similar bill in the Senate, S.673, to permit newspapers to operate in much the same manner political "educational" groups operate.

The premise of S.673 ,Amends the Internal Revenue Code to exempt from income taxation a newspaper corporation or organization if: (1) it publishes on a regular basis a newspaper for general circulation; (2) its newspaper contains local, national, and international news stories of interest to the general public and the distribution of such newspaper is necessary or valuable in achieving an educational purpose; and (3) the preparation of the material contained in such newspaper follows a methodology generally accepted as educational…Exempts the advertising income of a tax-exempt newspaper corporation or organization from taxation as unrelated business income and allows a charitable tax deduction for contributions to such newspaper corporation or organization.”

HR 3602 provides for the same.

There is specific language in the Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution regarding the press: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…”

There is little doubt most traditional branded media have favored the Democratic platform. Newsbusters said more than 13 “journalists” from major outlets like The Los Angeles Times, The Chicago Tribune, Newsweek and Time magazine went to work for the Obama administration after the election.

The plight of newspapers is a result of complex factors, but mostly a result of lack of responsiveness to new methods for delivering news. Setting a precedent of providing free content to all is a disincentive to those who might actually pay. Newspapers have also become reliant on wire services like the Associated Press to cover stories, even if the events covered happen at home. Cable networks run a 24/7 news and analysis cycle, meaning breaking news is delivered instantly.

Because of reliance on wire services whose writers may even hail from nonprofit organizations with a leftwing bent, newspapers have eroded their brands by preaching to only one choir, and that choir happens to be one that will not pay for a subscription.

Any involvement of government in the newspaper business should be decried. If newspapers want to openly register as “educational” organizations, the option already exists. The difference: they won’t really be newspapers anymore. If a newspaper opts for a non-profit model, it cannot really call itself a newspaper.

Bills introduced by Democrats open a door that as any seasoned political observer knows, will swing wider with time. HR 3602 and S.673 are nothing more than a quid pro quo for support of a single political party in our opinion. These bills inch America ever closer to de facto state-run media models. The door should slam shut on those bills immediately.--by Kay B. Day

[Help us combat statist search engines that dominate the market. Use the icons below to share this article.]

 

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

« More broken promises as Senate Finance shoots down transparency on healthcare bill | Main | Glenn Beck defends anti-McCain comments, taps Main Street psyche »

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Source
    Just three of 20 House and Senate members showed up for the hearing, in which the Democratic chairwoman left early to vote on a House bill, leaving the ranking Republican in charge. But after Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York returned, she emphatically declared what the hearing was most definitely not about.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.