U.S. News and Commentary

 

 Visit FFRW.

 

 The US Report, an indie publisher, features stories about politics, public figures and government. Learn more about The US Report  and the credentials of our contributorsHelp us keep TUSR online; use the PayPal link below.

Subscribe with Kindle

Visit Florida D.C. Women's Project 

 

SEARCH THE US REPORT:

Visit our new Books and Sundries page for recommended reads!

NEWS BRIEFS

Feb. 19, 2012

*Book Review: Being George Washington
*Romney camp erred on context, date... (The US Report)
*Politico says GOP candidates 'not worthy' of journalists  (The US Report)

 Election 2012, Resource Pages  (The US Report)

Please visit The US Report bookstore!

Need a speaker for your next event? Contact us.



Saturday
Aug082009

Just how much does the Associated Press love the Democrats?

Astounded is a great word to describe my reaction to an Associated Press story about pharmaceutical companies pushing large amounts of cash towards Democrats. I've often critted AP stories about global warming AKA climate change AKA the little ice age. But the story, 'Obama's health care plan helped by drug industry' contains a remark so misleading I felt compelled to speak up. Here's the sentence in question: "The White House and allies in Congress are well aware of the effort by Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, a somewhat surprising political alliance, given the industry's recent history of siding with Republicans and the Democrats' disdain for special interests."

What astounds about that statement?

For starters, 'Democrats' disdain for special interests.' Is the writer of the story so naive s/he really believes Democrats have disdain for special interests? If you believe that is a true statement, I've got a car that runs on bubble gum I can sell you.

The other "astoundment" is the writer's self-contradiction. Further along in the story, s/he notes: "Drugmakers have also funneled more money to Democrats in recent years, a trend that began soon after they gained control of Congress."

Maybe the AP should take a look at this story in National Journal. Here's an excerpt:

"That's not to say that the traditional order of the influence industry is likely to remain the same. On the question of who would emerge as the big winner among a dozen top interest groups during President Obama's first term in office, 78 percent of the Democratic Insiders picked the wind and solar power associations, representing alternative-energy industries. The runner-up among Democrats was the Environmental Defense Fund of the green lobby, selected by 45 percent, with the AFL-CIO, standing for organized labor, coming in third at 43 percent. (The Insiders were asked to choose three groups from a list of 12 and could volunteer others.)...Conversely, an even larger share of Republican Insiders -- 84 percent -- said that the AFL-CIO (labor) was likely to get the biggest boost under Obama. The runner-up was a tie between the wind and solar power associations and the American Association for Justice, representing trial lawyers; each was picked by 40 percent of the Republicans."

Democrats have held Congress for almost 3 years. They have yet to take ownership of what they did before and after.

Media sinks lower and lower. Pretty soon we're going to need a submarine to find them.

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

« Do Pelosi, Hoyer perpetuate disinformation with ‘USA Today’ editorial? | Main | Cornyn issues ‘fishy’ list, confirms ‘facts are stubborn things’ »

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.