May 22, 2013

Today's Question

Which senator wrote the amendment that gave military leaders the right to "quell...civil disturbances" without presidential approval? Answer.

Please use the PayPal button above to donate to The US Report.

Subscribe with Kindle

Search the US Report. 


Please visit The US Report bookstore!

Need a speaker for your next event? Contact us.

 

__________

 The US Report, an indie publisher, features stories about politics, public figures and government. Learn more about The US Report  and the credentials of our contributorsHelp us keep TUSR online; use the PayPal link in the right column.

__________

Entries in federal entitlement programs (13)

Thursday
Apr082010

California study on immigration—what media left out 

A US Customs and Border Protection officer checks an individual's documents as he enters the United States. [Photo by James R. Tourtellotte] My hometown newspaper, like thousands of others, runs stories not only from wire services but also from individual newspapers around the country. In Thursday’s paper, there’s a headline, ‘Report: Immigration amnesty no big deal.’ Written by Matt O’Brien, the article originated in the Contra Costa Times.

Click to read more ...

Wednesday
Feb242010

Media report Democrats rant about entitlements, but ignore they blocked reform under Bush

Updated on Wednesday, February 24, 2010 at 1:03PM by Registered CommenterKay B. Day, Editor

Commentary by Kay B. Day

As Democrats rant about alleged GOP obstructionists and threaten to ram a hybrid healthcare bill down American throats, the only conclusion an informed rational person could come to would be the need to start over. Social Security is in trouble, Medicare is in trouble, and although Congress had a chance to act 4 years ago, they didn’t. Democrats blocked reform and they were proud to do so.

First, consider a report from trustees of the Medicare and Social Security trust funds. In May, 2009, the report predicted Social Security trust fund assets will be depleted in 2037. The picture for Medicare is equally bleak: “[W]hile Medicare's annual costs were 3.2 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2008, or about three quarters of Social Security's, they are projected to surpass Social Security expenditures in 2028…”

When President George W. Bush wanted to reform social security, many of us who would gladly accept responsibility for decisions about the money we are required to pay in were denied the opportunity by Democrat obstructionists.


Click to read more ...

Tuesday
Jan262010

Blog to media: Arizona clinic isn't first Mayo site to stop taking Medicare

Commentary by Kay B. Day

Medicare notice on Mayo Jacksonville page. [Screen snip]Mayo Clinic announced it would stop taking Medicare at an Arizona clinic and media seized this as news. Here’s a blog flash for you: the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville hasn’t accepted Medicare Pt. B for quite some time. And having Medicare Advantage won’t help.

President Barack Obama praised Mayo as a beacon on the healthcare hill.

But hospital systems don’t have the option the federal government has, that of fabricating paper money.

The Wall Street Journal noted: “Mayo says it lost $840 million last year treating Medicare patients, the result of the program's low reimbursement rates. Its hospital and four clinics in Arizona—including the Glendale facility—lost $120 million. Providers like Mayo swallow some of these Medicare losses, while also shifting the cost by charging more to private patients and insurers.”

Click to read more ...

Friday
Sep042009

Why it’s time for some soul searching within the GOP

by Kay B. Day

Photo of President Ronald Reagan, from the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Library. Despite success with the 2008 elections, the DNC isn’t guaranteed future success. They are at present committing the sins of their predecessors—absolute power is a troublesome advantage. As I predicted, a Democratic Congress led by far lefties combined with an inexperienced leftie president, are engaging in record amounts of federal spending.

Despite a promise to go through the budget line by line, President Barack Obama has not done that, instead expanding the government. Despite a promise to reform healthcare, Democrats have failed miserably with the product known as HR 3200, the healthcare bill that will eventually, if passed, result in a single payer system with the government in charge of healthcare. If Waxman Markey (HR 2454) becomes law, Americans will pay more for everything because any product or process emitting carbon will be taxed.

And we must admit to ourselves the Dems are geniuses at tax-grabbing—they’ve explored a national sales tax (value-added tax), taxes on soft drinks, cigarettes and whatever else they can get their mitts on.

And by the way, our milk prices will probably rise since HR 2997 was passed—dairy price supports were raised by Dems. And for the final insulting stroke, a tax dodger heads up the committee writing our tax regulations. Another oversees the Treasury.

Click to read more ...

Thursday
Sep032009

Ferrara’s healthcare analysis dispels myth, focuses on facts

Updated on Thursday, September 3, 2009 at 11:58AM by Registered CommenterKay B. Day, Editor

by Kay B. Day

We believe President Lyndon B. Johnson’s ‘Great Society’ agenda created many of the financial and social problems we have today. Starting with 19 million enrollees in the mid-1960s, Medicare is expected to comprise 11 percent of the US economy by 2030, covering 79 million people. Removing such a large consumer group from the private sector is a primary driver of increasing health costs for those of us in private plans. If you have payroll taxes deducted, you are subsidizing Medicare. And if you want your social security, you have to sign up for the plan. Like lending, railroads and the post office, Medicare is a financial quagmire. Those who can buy a private supplemental policy to Medicare because it enables them to receive better healthcare. [Photo from White House website.]Could the healthcare debate get any crazier? Big government fans curse protesters and small government fans give as good as they get. But rarely are facts discussed. Even more rarely are solutions discussed.

What we must admit to ourselves before we can take an Obama step “forward,” is that Congress miserably failed the task at hand. If you haven’t read any of the bills or proposals coming out of House and Senate committees, you should do so if you plan to discuss healthcare reform. I doubt there would be a single Main Street proponent of any of these bills if everyone read them. There is an excellent analysis of all the legislative efforts written by Peter Ferrara and published at The Heartland Institute. The Institute leans conservative, but Ferrara focuses on actual language and figures politicians from both parties use to justify their positions. So if you can’t agree with him politically, you can at least use some of the data he includes to form your own opinion.

Thankfully Ferrara doesn’t veer into Biblical justification. If I hear one more proselytizer tell me how to be a better Christian by giving the government control over another sector of the economy, I will refuse to turn the other cheek. One could celebrate the fact liberals are apparently finding God if one were a right wing evangelical. All I can say is if you’re using God to justify more big government spending and a dramatic increase in the size of government, you’d best re-examine your faith and, whether you’re a right wing evangelical or a left wing socialist, do not tell me how to practice mine regardless of the social issue at hand—yes, healthcare is a social issue. And an economic issue.

One myth Ferrara dispels relates to the uninsured. President Barack Obama talked a lot about that group during the campaigns, often citing the 45 million “uninsured.” Republicans have cited it too. Here are some facts:

Click to read more ...

Thursday
Aug062009

Dear Mr. Macon Phillips at The White House blog: 'Facts are stubborn things'

Recommended reading for The White House and Congress: 'Atlas Shrugged.' Ayn Rand's novel predicted the politics of today and the assault on freedom we are experiencing.I read with interest your post, ‘Facts are stubborn things,’ citing “disinformation” about health insurance reform. To be honest, disinformation isn’t really necessary when it comes to HR 3200. The Democratic approach to the healthcare crisis is not only inept, it is unsound. Our current crisis in my opinion has been largely created by government entitlement programs.

And just in case any of the “Netrootsters” find my comments “fishy,” I’m addressing you directly with these remarks. That way you don’t have to spend government money finding me.

I’ll be honest. There’s a big chance I might let my concerns about HR 3200 slip during a “casual conversation” in a coffee shop or at the corner store. I talk to everybody—the diversity of our great country never ceases to fascinate me. I must share with you I talk to a lot of Democrats—most of my family and many of my friends and almost all my associates in the writing sphere pledge loyalty to your party. Many of them, by the way, don’t appreciate your health insurance approach either. And almost all of them are upset with your Party’s spending.

Mr. Phillips, are you acquainted with the Library of Congress? Amazing place. I’d really appreciate it if you’d visit the library and have a sit down with the United States Constitution. I assume you are on federal payroll, so I think it would be a great idea if you were to frame a copy of the Constitution and hang it above your desk. Because when you published your post,  you made federal employee history.

You are the first federal employee I can recall to use The White House to so publicly and flagrantly trespass on the intent of our founders’ very first words in the sacred and technically legally binding document known as the Constitution. Here is one of the most egregious passages in your post: “There is a lot of disinformation about health insurance reform out there, spanning from control of personal finances to end of life care. These rumors often travel just below the surface via chain emails or through casual conversation. Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to flag@whitehouse.gov.”

A number of media have run stories about your abuse of the first amendment. You didn’t get that far with me. You tripped over the very first paragraph in the Preamble. In the Preamble, “We the people” ordained and established the Constitution with a number of goals in mind. Among those goals: “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity…” At least one well-regarded conservative blogger believes you have abused a federal law.

Emails and private conversations are private. No government official, particularly an official working closely with the top executive in our land, should ever ask the people’s friends and neighbors to spy on behalf of partisan legislation. Your administration has shocked me before--questionable campaign donations and our president's own earmarks when he was in the Senate are real controversies blue chip media has ignored. But your little spy-on-your-neighbor project tops the list.

This may shock you, but Americans are not stupid. From the day laborer to the CEO, many of us are not ill-informed—technology has given us amazing tools for monitoring our government. We could not do that at key moments in our fiscal history, such as the time President Lyndon Johnson established Medicare and Medicaid. Both programs have moved consumers from the private to the public sector, increasing premiums and costs for those of us on private insurance plans. In addition, hospitals are required to provide medical care to people who come to our country under the radar, never bothering to observe federal law integral to maintaining our nation’s security. Federal programs have distorted the market. Furthermore, slack oversight has resulted in record fraud afflicting public programs. You don't have to take my word for that. It's documented by the FBI.

Healthcare is rightfully and logically the business of state government.

You may be miffed that your party cannot delude the populace with your own disinformation campaign. All politics is local as they say and you may be upset that constituents are actually trying to talk to the people they elect to represent them. And here’s a revelation. Once elected, that official is bound to represent voters from any political party, even if they are, as Dem California senator Barbara Boxer said, "well-dressed."

Democrats have done a poor job of explaining exactly what is in HR 3200—even our president’s news conference dispensed nothing more than rhetoric. If health reform fails, it will fail because your Party attempted to hoodwink the populace by passing a bill many in Congress admit they haven’t read.

Not one Democrat has talked about the constituency in the 45 million who do not obtain health insurance. Not one Democrat has talked about the long-term costs of HR 3200 or shared that the Congressional Budget Office has pointed out a negative impact on the vulnerability of minimum wage employees.

If our president wants to sell a plan to the people, he should have the bill on the teleprompter and use specifics. If our president wants to clear up “disinformation,” the smart tactic is to supply facts about HR 3200 rather than resorting to political rhetoric.

And above all, please remember, the Constitution provides ample restraints on what you and your Party can do to control private statements that seem “fishy” to you and the president. We are a free people.

Facts, Mr. Phillips, are “stubborn things” indeed.

Dear Mr. Macon Phillips at The White House blog: 'Facts are stubborn things'
by Kay B. Day
The US Report, Aug. 6, 2009

 

Page 1 2