Leftwing bloggers are some of the most conflicted angst-filled people on the face of the earth. Don't believe me? Pick a leftwing blog and go read. It won't take you long to see what I'm talking about.
The Daily Caller's Jonathan Strong writes about Journolister Matt Yglesias' exchange with conservative writers on Twitter. Apparently Yglesias thinks it's okay to fudge the statistics if you're justifying a political position like high speed rail.
Yglesias reportedly said, “Fighting dishonesty with dishonesty is sometimes the right thing for advocates to do, yes.”
Yglesias now blogs for the Center for American Progress, a think tank that claims to be nonpartisan.
In my opinion, that's sort of like my hound dog claiming to be a poodle, but a think tank is entitled to describe its mission as it pleases.
Yglesias also displayed the anger I've witnessed when trying to talk rationally with politicos who think like he does. He dropped the F-bomb and hung up.
Journolist was a group of people who claimed to be reporters, bloggers, political operatives and others who in my opinion just wanted then Sen. Barack Obama to be president.
The group communicated on a listserv, talking about shaping the political narrative during the 2008 presidential elections.
The Daily Caller broke the Journolist story and government-allied media refuse to even talk about it. Makes them a little bit uncomfortable I suppose.
At any rate, tell your mom, dad, neighbors and hound dog you really can't trust high profile media brands anymore (not that you ever really could, considering what President John F. Kennedy pulled off.)
The left screams about Fox News for that very reason. It's the one cable network they can't control. And standards, for statists, aren't a problem. You want something accomplished, all you have to do is lie.
I repeatedly told my readers during the 2008 elections media was biased and would never give a GOP candidate a fair shake. I was right and I like saying that over and over just so you don't forget.