Big media catch up to The US Report on Saddam’s WMDs

The US Report featured an analysis about WikiLeaks’ publication of official military documents disclosing weapons of mass destruction in Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. I wrote my column on November 9. Big media is just now discovering the significance and it’s obvious the political fact based on a lie—there were no WMDs in Iraq—was part of an overall, continuing assassination of US leadership.

But there's more to this story than WikiLeaks.

Click to read more ...

Did ‘Oil for Food’ corruption affect character assassination of Bush?

President George W. Bush was branded a liar, a failure and worse by Democrats like Sen. Harry Reid (Nev.), and progressive media were only too happy to oblige. Bush is making the rounds to promote his new book, and suddenly the ‘Bushisms’ pour forth from leftwingers on social media and on talk shows.

On CNN's Parker Spitzer on Tuesday, one guest was a fashion designer who jumped on Bush's character like a pit bull going after a bunny rabbit. Never mind facts.

But revisiting media accounts of the time period before Bush took office and after the under-emphasized reportage on the Oil for Food scandal raise questions media probably would’ve asked had Bush not been a Republican.

Who benefited from Oil for Food corruption and how did that impact the perception of Bush by the public?

Click to read more ...